On this page
The casino top-10 page is the affiliate's storefront, and Google has spent years deciding which storefronts deserve to be found. The pages that survive are not the ones with the most keywords or the most stars. They are the ones that show their work: what was tested, by whom, and why number one is number one.
Here is how we structure a top list, block by block, with the rules behind each block. You can click through the result on our demo top-10 page (fictional brands, real structure).
Start with the job of the page
The reader asked one question: which casino should I pick, and why? Google's guidance on writing high-quality reviews describes what a good answer looks like, and almost every point maps to a block on the page:
- evidence of first-hand use (screenshots, timings, your own records);
- quantitative measurements, not adjectives;
- benefits and drawbacks;
- what sets each option apart from the alternatives;
- for "best" claims, why it is best, with first-hand evidence;
- ranked lists with enough useful content to stand on their own.
Gambling also sits squarely in "Your Money or Your Life" territory. Google's helpful content guidance says that for YMYL topics it gives even more weight to content with strong E-E-A-T, and that trust matters most. Its rater guidelines list financial security as a YMYL area.
Above the fold: five things, in this order
- An honest H1. "Best new online casinos (October 2026)" is fine if you actually re-checked the list in October. A month stamp on a stale page is a trust leak.
- The disclosure, before the first recommendation. More on wording below.
- One sentence of methodology with a link to the full version: "We opened accounts, deposited and withdrew at every casino on this page."
- The top three as cards, each with the facts players compare: welcome offer with its wagering requirement, minimum deposit, withdrawal time you measured, licence, and one honest drawback.
- One CTA style, and a line with 18+, "new players" and "T&Cs apply" right under each offer. In regulated markets, the significant terms belong next to the offer, not in a footer.
Use "Visit" or "Get the offer" for the button, not "Claim your bonus now!!". Accurate buttons convert slightly less on the first click and noticeably better at registration, because the player arrives expecting exactly what they get. Test it on your own traffic.
The comparison table that does the work
The table is where the page earns its ranking for "compare" intent. What we put in it:
| Column | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Rank + score | Score out of 10 or 5, with the formula on the methodology page |
| Welcome offer | Amount, wagering, max bonus, "18+ T&Cs apply" |
| Payout time | Measured by you, with the date of the test |
| Payment methods | Icons are fine; also say which ones work for withdrawals |
| Licence | Regulator and licence number, linked to the register |
| Best for | One phrase: "live dealer", "low deposits", "fast payouts" |
| Last checked | A date per row, not per page |
On mobile, turn rows into cards rather than forcing a horizontal scroll, and keep filters (payment method, bonus type, licence) on the page so players don't bounce back to search to refine.
Methodology and E-E-A-T you can see
E-E-A-T is not a direct ranking factor, Google says, but the things that demonstrate it are what readers and raters look for. On a casino list, that means:
- A methodology page with the scoring weights, what you test (registration, KYC, deposit, withdrawal, support, game library, responsible gambling tools) and how often you re-test.
- Evidence from testing: withdrawal screenshots with timestamps, the support chat that took 40 minutes to answer. Google's "Who, How, and Why" check asks who made the content, how, and why.
- Real authors with real profiles, marked up properly. Google's Article structured data docs ask for just the name in author.name and a url or sameAs pointing to a page that identifies the author.
- Drawbacks for every brand, including number one. A list where every casino is perfect reads like what it is.
And where the page lives matters. Google's site reputation policy uses a medical site hosting a third-party "best casinos" page as its example of a violation, and its November 2024 clarification says first-party involvement doesn't change the third-party nature of such content. In August 2026 Google changed how this is enforced for searchers in the European Economic Area, where the section may be split off to rank on its own instead of receiving a manual action. Either way, renting a news site's authority for your casino list is a strategy with an expiry date.
Schema that still earns its keep
Structured data in 2026 is less about winning SERP features and more about being unambiguous. What changed, and what to use:
- FAQ rich results are gone. They were limited to well-known government and health sites in August 2023, and Google's documentation changelog shows them deprecated in May 2026. Keep a good FAQ for readers; don't expect a SERP feature from it.
- No stars on the list itself. Google's review snippet guidelines say to review a specific item, not a list of items, and not to aggregate ratings from other sites. Put Review markup on individual casino review pages.
- ItemList won't give you a carousel. Google's carousel docs limit carousels to courses, movies, recipes and restaurants. ItemList still describes the order of your list; just don't do it for the rich result.
- Use what describes the page honestly: Article with author and dates, BreadcrumbList, Organization for your own site, ItemList for the ranking.
A minimal, honest setup for the list page looks like this:
| Article | headline, author (Person with url), datePublished, dateModified |
| ItemList | itemListElement: ListItem with position and url of each review page |
| BreadcrumbList | Home › Casinos › Best new casinos |
Disclosure and compliance, by market
Affiliate money is fine. Hiding it is not.
- Mark the links. Google asks for affiliate links to carry rel="sponsored" (since 2021); nofollow is still accepted.
- US: the FTC's Endorsement Guides FAQ says the label "affiliate link" alone may not be understood, and that the closer the disclosure is to the recommendation, the better.
- UK: the ASA's affiliate marketing advice says both the business and the affiliate are responsible under the CAP Code, that marketing must be obviously identifiable, and that a small "may earn commission" line at the bottom is unlikely to be enough. CAP has said since 2017 that gambling affiliate content is marketing under the Code. Operators are on the hook too: the Gambling Commission's LCCP 1.1.2 makes licensees responsible for the third parties they contract with.
- Keyword hygiene: in September 2026 the ASA upheld a complaint against a casino review site whose paid search ad appeared for a search about help with gambling. Exclude problem-gambling terms from every campaign that points at your list.
- Every page: 18+ (or the local age), responsible gambling links for the market, licence lines that match the geo, and no content that appeals to minors.
Speed: the ranking factor you control completely
Core Web Vitals are good when LCP is within 2.5 seconds, INP is 200 ms or less and CLS is 0.1 or less, measured at the 75th percentile of real visits. Top lists usually fail on three things: a hero image nobody needed, ten tracking scripts, and logos that load late and push the table down. Fix all three: inline the critical CSS, set width and height on every logo, defer anything that isn't the table. Our demo page is plain HTML with no framework, which is most of the trick.
The checklist
- H1 date matches a real re-check; "last checked" per row.
- Disclosure above the first recommendation, worded for the market.
- Methodology page with weights and test evidence; real author profiles.
- Every brand has a drawback; every offer shows wagering and "18+ T&Cs apply".
- Affiliate links carry rel="sponsored".
- Article + ItemList + BreadcrumbList; no review stars on the list; no expectations from FAQ markup.
- LCP under 2.5 s on a mid-range phone; logos sized; scripts deferred.
- Problem-gambling keywords excluded from paid campaigns.
Running paid traffic to the list too? Read what to test first on pre-landers, or see all our page types on the Growth page.
FAQ
Do FAQ sections still get rich results on casino pages?
No. Google limited FAQ rich results to well-known government and health sites in August 2023, and its documentation changelog shows FAQ rich results deprecated in May 2026. An FAQ section can still help readers; just don't build the page around a SERP feature that no longer exists.
Can a top-10 list page show review stars in Google?
Google's review snippet guidelines say review markup should be about a specific item, not a category or a list of items, and you should not aggregate ratings from other sites. Stars, if any, belong on an individual review page.
Should affiliate links be nofollow or sponsored?
Google asks for affiliate links to be qualified with rel="sponsored", and still accepts nofollow. Either way, the link must be marked.
Where should the affiliate disclosure go?
Near the top, before the first recommendation, and next to the links where practical. The FTC says the closer the disclosure is to the recommendation the better; in the UK, the ASA expects marketing to be obviously identifiable before the reader engages, with labels like Ad.
Is it safe to host casino lists on a high-authority third-party site?
Google's site reputation policy uses a medical site hosting a third-party 'best casinos' page as its example of a violation. Expect the page to be demoted or separated from the host's rankings, depending on the market.
18+Gambling content for business readers. Every demo we link to runs on play money. If gambling stops being fun, free confidential help is available: BeGambleAware (UK), 1-800-GAMBLER (US), Gambling Therapy (worldwide).
Sources
- Google Search Central, Write high quality reviews: developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/ecommerce/write-high-quality-reviews
- Google Search Central, Reviews system: developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/reviews-system
- Google Search Central, Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content: developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/creating-helpful-content
- Google, Search Quality Rater Guidelines (Sept 2025): static.googleusercontent.com/media/guidelines.raterhub.com/en//searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf
- Google Search Central, Spam policies (site reputation policy): developers.google.com/search/docs/essentials/spam-policies
- Google Search Central blog, Site reputation abuse clarification (Nov 2024): developers.google.com/search/blog/2024/11/site-reputation-abuse
- Google Search Central blog, Site reputation policy update (Aug 2026): developers.google.com/search/blog/2026/08/update-site-reputation-policy
- Google Search Central blog, HowTo and FAQ changes (Aug 2023): developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/08/howto-faq-changes
- Google Search Central, Documentation updates: developers.google.com/search/updates
- Google Search Central, Review snippet structured data: developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structured-data/review-snippet
- Google Search Central, Carousel (ItemList) structured data: developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structured-data/carousel
- Google Search Central, Article structured data: developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structured-data/article
- Google Search Central, Qualify outbound links: developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/qualify-outbound-links
- Google Search Central blog, Link tagging and link spam update (2021): developers.google.com/search/blog/2021/07/link-tagging-and-link-spam-update
- FTC, Endorsement Guides: What people are asking: www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/ftcs-endorsement-guides-what-people-are-asking
- ASA / CAP, Online affiliate marketing: www.asa.org.uk/advice-online/affiliate-marketing.html
- ASA / CAP, Gambling on your affiliates?: www.asa.org.uk/news/gambling-on-your-affiliates.html
- ASA ruling, Smart Gravity Ltd (Sept 2026): www.asa.org.uk/rulings/smart-gravity-ltd.html
- UK Gambling Commission, LCCP 1.1.2 Responsibility for third parties: www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/1-1-2-responsibility-for-third-parties-all-licences
- web.dev, Web Vitals: web.dev/articles/vitals



